Back to Main Page
“ THE ROYAL WAR OF THE GOD’S”
There is very substantial evidence that the "Jews" of today are
descended from Cain. We have no less than the words of Yeashua the Messiah
Himself concerning this.
Once it is understood the "Jews" are devils walking around in shoe
leather, we can begin to see the guiding hand of the great world conspiracy and
all the monstrous problems we are faced with today.
Without an understanding of the Two Seedlines, we are at a
detrimental loss to know who the enemy is. The knowledge, or the lack of it, is
the difference between the brightest day or the blackest night. Because this
verse is not properly understood is one of the reasons that Yahweh states in
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge..." (Hosea 4:6) (KJV)
One of the very first things those opposed to a literal Satan-spawned physical
Seedline do, is point out the fact that the information can be found in the
Jewish Talmud. We find the following on pages in a book "Eve Did She Or Didn't
She? The Seedline Hypothesis Under Scrutiny" by Evangelist Ted R. Weiland, ISBN
0-9679392-0-8, Library of Congress Number: 00-090494, Published by Mission to
Israel Ministries, P.O. Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363)
"So who benefits from this scriptural corruption, and where might
you expect to find this Seedline doctrine taught? One Seedline teacher
accurately pointed out that this hypothesis is not of modern origin: ‘The
historicity of a sexual interpretation of original sin can be documented from
the literature of antiquity and clearly proves beyond any doubt that this belief
did not originate with modern man.' (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The
Vision (Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p.
"This is true, but from "what ancient literature" is this
hypothesis extracted? This same seedliner documented several instances and in
every case the material came from post-Babylonian captivity Judahites. (Now here
we really must disagree with Mr. Weiland because at no time in history have the
Judahites been Jews. here may have been some who converted to Judaism, but only
a few and certainly never the entire tribe of Judah)
"In other words, from Judahites who had been educated in
Babylonian traditions. Among others, this seedliner quoted rabbis who quoted the
Talmud as "proof" for his Seedline beliefs: ‘...it (the Seedline hypothesis) was
a common teaching among the (post-Babylonian) rabbis of antiquity...In one
place, we read: ‘rabbi Johanan stated. When the serpent copulated with Eve, he
infused her with lust.' (Yebamoth 103b) Another rabbi states: ‘Thus I have
learnt, that when the serpent had intercourse with Eve he injected defilement
into her.' (Haye Sarah 126a) Lastly, another replies: ‘You rightly said that
when the serpent had carnal intercourse with Eve he injected into her
defilement." (Haye Sarah 126b) (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The Vision
(Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p. 28)
This seedliner also quoted several other Babylonian-influenced
works of antiquity:
"This (Seedline) interpretation is confirmed in the ancient
literature of Israel, especially the commentaries on the Hebrew Bible written in
Aramaic and commonly known as Targums. The commentaries were written after the
(remnant's, people from the Tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi) return from
Babylon...One text gives this interpretation of Genesis 4:1: ‘And Adam knew his
wife Eve, who was pregnant by the Angel Sammael, and she conceived and bare
Cain; and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and
she said, I have acquired a man, the angel of the Lord." (Targum of Jonathan to
Genesis 4:1) Another ancient commentary gives a similar interpretation of the
same passage: ‘And Adam knew his wife Eve, who had desired the Angel; and she
conceived, and bare Cain; and she said, I have acquired a man, the angel of the
Lord..." (Palestinian Targum to Genesis 4:1) In another rabbinic work we find a
similar interpretation...And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly
beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a
man from the Lord." (Pirke de Rabbi Elieser, 21) One Rabbinic source states:
‘Even bore Cain from the filth of the serpent, and therefore from him were
descended all the wicked generations, and from his side is the abode of spirits
and demons.' (Ahare Moth 76b) A similar explanation for the evil deeds of Cain's
lineage is found elsewhere. We read: ‘For two beings had intercourse with Eve,
and she conceived from both and bore two hildren. Each followed one of the male
parents, to this side and one to the other, and similarly their characters. On
the side of Cain are all the haunts of the evil species, from which come evil
spirit and demons." (Bereshith 36b) (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The
Vision (Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p.
Now we know that Christ said that the Jews are liars in John 8:44
but that does not mean that a liar will not sometimes tell the truth. Therefore
one of the very first things those opposed to a literal Satan-spawned physical
Seedline do, is point out the fact the information can be found in the Talmud.
This is a really sneaky deceptive method used by many, to declare guilt by
association. The question must be asked: "Is every single word in the Talmud
This idea is built on the assumption, that if it is found in the
Talmud, it is automatically wrong. For anyone who uses this approach, we would
challenge them to prove every single word in the Talmud to be false. It simply
cannot be done, even though it is a collection of the most evil and blasphemous
writings ever put together. Not only is there evidence found in the Talmud
substantiating the seduction of Eve, but evidence can be found in "The Lost
Books of The bible and The Forgotten books of Eden," "The Protevangelion"
10:1-10:" And when her sixth month was come, Joseph returned form his building
houses abroad, which was his trade, and entering into the house, found the
Virgin grown big: Then smiting upon his face, he said, With what face ca I look
up to the Lord my God? Or, what shall I say concerning this young woman? For I
received her a Virgin out of the temple of the Lord my God! And have not
preserved her such! Who has thus deceived me? Who has committed this evil in my
house, and seducing the Virgin from me, hath defiled her? IS NOT THE HISTORY OF
ADAM EXACTLY ACCOMPLISHED IN ME? FOR IN THE VERY INSTANT OF HIS GLORY, THE
SERPENT CAME AND FOUND EVE ALONE, AND SEDUCED HER. JUST AFTER THE SAME MANNER IT
HAS HAPPENED TO ME. Then Joseph arising from the ground, called her, and said, O
thou who hast been so much favoured by God, why hast thou done this. Why hast
thou debased thy soul, who wast educated in the Holy of Holies, and received thy
food from the hand of angels? But she, with a flood of tears, replied, I am
innocent, and have known no man." Some even go so far as to cite the
Spirit and the Flesh as the Two Seeds. This is one of the most ridiculous,
misdirected applications of holy writ to come from one pretending to be
inspired. It is so nonsensical, we will not affiliate the sacred Name of Yahweh
with it. If one believes the two seeds of Genesis 3:15 are such, this is the way
the verse should have read:
"And the Lord God said to Eve's flesh, Because thou hast done
this, thy flesh is cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field;
and thy flesh shall go upon its belly, and dust shalt thy flesh eat all the days
of thy life: And I will put enmity between the flesh of the woman and the spirit
of the woman, and between the offspring of her flesh and the offspring of her
spirit, and offspring of her spirit shall bruise the head of the offspring of
her flesh, and the offspring of her flesh will bruise the heel of the offspring
of her spirit.
Among other very important details the opponents of Two Seedline
doctrine do not explain is: Why is Cain left totally out of the genealogy of
Adam? Genesis, Chapter 5, gives the genealogy of Adam to Shem, Ham and Japheth,
and Cain is not mentioned once! WHY?
Other genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never
leaves out a son! (Especially a firstborn son) If one reads Genesis 4:1
correctly, as depicted, it is not there either. Why is Cain totally left out??
Cain's descendants are mentioned separately in Genesis 4:17-24 and it doesn't
list Adam as the father of Cain! WHY???
The next place we find Cain in the Scriptures is Genesis 15:19 and
we will have to read verses 18 through 21:
"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto
thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river,
the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And
the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Ammonites, and the
Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites." (Genesis 15:18-21) (KJV)
One of these nations among the Canaanites was the KENITES (#7017
Strong's) which were DESCENDANTS OF CAIN. Being that Cain was of the SATANIC
SEEDLINE, he would infect his satanic blood AMONG ALL THESE TEN NATIONS. And the
"Kenizzites" were Edomites.
In the Peake's Commentary on the bible, page 116 we find this
about this mixed group of nations spoken of in Genesis 15:19-21:
"When the Israelites entered Canaan they found there a VERY MIXED
population generally designated by the term Amorite or Canaanite."
The Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, Abridged by Ralph
Earle, page 38, says:
"The Kenites. Here are ten nations mentioned, though afterwards
reckoned but seven; see Deuteronomy 7:1; Acts 13:19. Probably some of them which
existed in Abram's time had been BLENDED with others before the time of Moses,
so that seven only out of the ten then remained."
"[KEE nights] (metalsmiths)-- the name of a wandering tribe of
people who were associated with the Midianites (Judges 1:16) and, later, with
the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:6). The Kenites lived in the desert regions of
Sinai, Midian, Edom, Amalek, and the Negev. The Bible first mentions the Kenites
as one of the groups that lived in Canaan during the time of Abraham (Genesis
15:19); their territory was to be taken by the Israelites (Numbers 24:21-22).
The Kenites were metal craftsmen who may have traced their ancestry to TUBAL-CAIN
(a descendant of Cain) (Genesis 4:22). (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible
Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers)
The next mention of the descendants of Cain is found in 1
"And THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES which dwelt at Jabez; the
Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. THESE ARE THE KENITES that came
of Hemath, the father of the house of RECHAB." (KJV)
The Wycliff Bible Comentary, editors: Charles F. Pfeiffer &
Everett F. Harrison has this to say on page 8, and this quote will cover Genesis
"CURSED (arűr) ART THOU. The Lord singled out the originator and
instigator of the temptation for special condemnation and degradation. From that
moment he must crawl in the dust and even feed on it. He would slither his way
along in disgrace, and hatred would be directed against him from all directions.
Man would always regard him as a symbol of the degradation of the one who
slandered God (cf. Isaiah 65:25). HE WAS TO REPRESENT NOT MERELY THE SERPENT
RACE, BUT THE POWER OF THE EVIL KINGDOM. As long as life continued, men would
hate him and seek to destroy him. I WILL PUT ENMITY. The word "ębâ" denotes the
blood-feud that runs deepest in the heart of man (cf. Numbers 35:19-20; Ezekiel
25:15-17; 35:5-6) THOU SHALT BRUISE (shűp). A PROPHECY OF CONTINUING STRUGGLE
BETWEEN THE DESCENDANTS OF WOMAN AND OF THE SERPENT TO DESTROY EACH OTHER. The
verb shűp is rare (cf. Job 9:17; Psalm 139:11). It is the same in both clauses.
"When translated ‘crush' it seems appropriate to the reference
concerning the had of the serpent, but not quite so accurate in also rendered
lie in wait for, aim at or (LXX) watch for. The Vulgate renders it "conteret,"
"bruise" in the first instance and in this famous passage, CALLED THE
PROTEVAGEFIUM, ‘FIRST GOSPEL,' the announcement of a prolonged struggle,
perpetual antagonism, wounds on both sides, and eventual victory for the seed of
"God's promise that the head of the serpent was to be crushed
pointed forward to the coming of Messiah and guaranteed victory. Thus assurance
fell upon the ears of God's earliest creatures as a blessed hope of redemption."
The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 3, page 782:
"KENITES: Meaning (metalworkers, smiths). Clan or tribal name of
semi-nomadic peoples of South Palestine and Sinai. The Aramaic and Arabic
etymologis of the root ‘gyn' show that it has to do with metal and metal word
(thus the Hebrew word from this root, ‘lance'). This probably indicates that the
Kenites were metal workers, especially since Sinai and wadi ‘arabah were rich in
high grade cooper ore. W.F. Albright has pointed to the Beni Hassan mural in
Egypt (19th century B.C.)
"As an illustration of such a WONDERING GROUP OF SMITHS. This
mural depicts thirty-six men, women and children in characteristic Semitic dress
leading along with other animals, donkeys laden with MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS,
weapons and an item which Albright has identified as a BELLOWS. He has further
noted that Lemech's three children (Genesis 4:19-22) were responsible for HEARDS
(Jubal), MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS (Jubal), and METAL WORK (Tubal-Cain, or Tubal, THE
SMITH), the three occupations which seem most evident in the mural...2nd quote
from the same article: THE EARLY MONARCHY. During this period a significant
concentration of Kenites was located in the southern Judean territory. This is
clear from 1 Samuel 15:6 cited above and also from David's relations with them."
Postexilic references. In 1 Chronicles 2:55 the FAMILIES OF THE
SCRIBES living at Jabaz are said to be Kenites. Apparently, during the kingdom
and exile periods, certain Kenites had given up NOMADIC SMITHING and had taken
on a more sedentary, but equally honorable PROFESSION (?) OF SCRIBE.
Peake's Commentary on the Bible, page 114:
"The etymology of the name suggest THAT THEY WERE SMITHS OR
ARTIFICERS, a theory which is supported by their association with the Wadi
‘Arabah, where there were copper deposits which had been worked by the Egyptians
since the middle of the 3rd millennium..
The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown Commentary On The Whole bible has
this to say on Kenite, page 293:
"THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES; either civil or ecclesiastical
officers of the Kenite origin, WHO ARE HERE CLASSIFIED WITH THE TRIBE OF JUDAH,
NOT AS BEING DESCENDED FROM IT, but as dwellers within its territory, and in a
measure INCORPORATED with its people."
The Matthew Pool's Commentary On The Holy Bible has this to say on
the Kenites, Volume 1, page 778:
"THE SCRIBES; either civil, WHO WERE PUBLIC NOTARIES, WHO WROTE
AND SIGNED LEGAL INSTRUMENTS; OR ECCLESIASTICAL... and are here mentioned not as
if they were of the tribe of Judah, but because thy dwelt among them, and
probably were allied to them by marriages, and so in a manner incorporated with
them. Which dwelt, or rather, dwelt; Hebrew, were dwellers. For the other
translation, which dwelt, MAY SEEM TO INSINUATE THAT THESE WERE DESCENDANTS OF
JUDAH, WHICH THEY WERE NOT; but his translation ONLY SIGNIFIES COHABITATION WITH
THEM, for which cause they are here named with them.
All these things the Jews do today, here in America. And because
Christians have listened to the lying, deceiving, traitorous, Priests of Baal,
the Judeo-Christian Clergy they have almost destroyed our nation and are fast
destroying our people.
Now that we have established a solid foundation in the Holy Writ
concerning the Two Seedline doctrine, let's tell the story in a different way.
With this narrative, the one important fact revealed in the above passages is:
Yeashua our Messiah exposed the "Jews" for what they are many years ago.
You could spend thousands of dollars on books updating the story
to our present time, and it is still the same old story as it was two thousand
years ago, some people today have the audacity to insinuate that Our Redeemer
didn't know what he was talking about. We will start this portion of our study
with Genesis 3:14-15.
"And Yahweh said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this,
thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy
belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. And I
will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy (Kenite -"Jewish")
seed and her (White) seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his
Reread the second paragraph above. The center reference of the KJV
then takes us to Revelation 12:9:
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the
Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the
earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
Next we will go unaided to Matthew 3:7:
"But when he (John the Baptist) saw many of the Pharisees and
Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O GENERATION (offspring) OF
VIPERS, how can ye, being evil, speak good things for out of the abundance of
the heart (genetic intellect) the mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good
treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the
evil treasure bringeth forth evil things."
From here the KJV center reference takes us to Matthew 13:38:
"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the
kingdom (Israelites); but the tares (Jews) are the children of the wicked one."
With a reading of Colossians 2:15 we can see how Yahshua put the
Satanic/Jew/Seedline to an open shame and stripped them of their authority.
"And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of
them openly, triumphing over them in it."