**This reminds me of the plot I uncovered and exposed 2 years ago via
the Bible Codes when our government was plotting to nuke Miami
and blame it on the Syrians so they could go to war with
ISRAEL - Coastal Cities
IRAN - All Areas
8:10 a.m. CDT / 13:10 GMT - 3 Aug 2006
Wednesday August 2, 2006.
At 2 p.m. CDT (7 p.m. GMT), Ken-Welch.Com has issued a
Nuclear War Warning for:
Israeli coastal cities and the Republic of Iran.
Ken-Welch.com is the current outlet for a group of
researchers using the medium of reversed speech to track
national and international affairs. In March of this
year it reported on the presence of a smuggled nuclear
weapon near Houston, Texas, and followed the device's
removal and trans-shipment to the Mediterranean after it
was exposed by the Internet report. This White House
sponsored operation, dubbed the
Easter Surprise, was
designed to create a pretext for a nuclear attack on
On Sunday, July 30, Ken-Welch.com reported that in April
the Bush Administration placed a
nuclear weapons platform in
orbit for offensive purposes, and that the most likely
immediate target, in conjunction with the orchestrated
drama in the Middle East, was Iran.
On Monday, RS researchers began analyzing speech from
the Bush/Blair press conference which took place in
Washington D.C. on Friday (Jul 28), with particular
attention to the remarks of Tony Blair. A speech
reversal referring to George Bush, "He has released the
bomb" represents a key stage in the deployment of a
nuclear weapon. This key was also found in events
preceding the intended Easter detonation near Houston.
It indicates that the weapon and its triggering
mechanism have been certified as functional, and control
has been turned over to the person who will fire it.
Related events include the unremarked activation
three Israeli army divisions
for no apparent reason, and the nearness of an
exceptionally significant date in Jewish tradition,
referred to as "the saddest day of the year".
We believe that a nuclear event on Israeli soil is
Timing: We are dealing with probabilities here.
We believe the most likely time
period for the false-terror provocation will begin at
sundown in Jerusalem, tomorrow August 3rd. More
info will follow.
We expect that this will involve a small, portable bomb
with a yield of 12 Kilotons or less. The most likely
scenario, based on the previous operation, is as
- The weapon will likely be concealed aboard a
ship near a port city such as Haifa or
- Because it is small, total destruction will be
confined to the local area, less than 1 km.
- Fires and structural damage may be seen up to 2
km. Danger of flying glass, etc. to 5 km.
- Largest danger to civilians will be radioactive
fallout depending on wind direction.
- It will be considered a "miracle" that so few
people were killed.
Suggested precautions for Israel:
Avoid coastal areas within 6 km of the water and
stay away from windows.
Be prepared to evacuate if you are downwind from the
blast. Have a supply of drinking water, 2 days
food, maps, medicines, etc.
If not threatened by fallout stay where you are.
We believe the false-terror event in Israel will trigger
a nuclear attack on the Iranian Republic by the United
States within 12-24 hours, although the impression may
be created that it is Israel conducting the attack. The
attack is likely to be large, involving great
destruction and civilian casualties. Targets will
include ports, all military facilities, research
facilities, government centers, etc. Massive destruction
will eliminate any means of resistance to the invasion
that will follow. Although oil is the prize, the same
pattern as Iraq is expected: further restrictions on the
world oil supply and rapidly accelerating oil profits.
Suggestions for Iran.
If evacuating to the countryside, take time to plan,
take food, water, survival supplies, radio, etc. Do
not expect any form of aid or assistance. Band
together with others for mutual support.
Locate a shelter below ground level, and go there
immediately when you learn of the detonation in
Question: If I am in the Middle East and feel I should
protect myself, when should I take action? Answer:
Question: What about SYRIA? Answer: We have no data
that mentions Syria by name. This does not mean Syria is
safe - it simply means we have no data. On the other
hand, Iran has been a target for quite some time, and is
the U.S.'s top priority for destruction and conquest.
Prime Minister Tony Blair
Press Conference w/ George Bush
Washington, DC - July 28, 2001
Reversals featured in this sound clip
Fwd: ...militia in the south of lebanon
Rev: YOU MOCK THAT, KILL'EM,
THEN THE FLASH IN THE NIGHT
Fwd: ...package of proposals to get agreement
Rev: NUKE IT. DEATH.
Fwd: ...We want to see (a UN resolution)
Rev: PEACE NOT FOR YOU
Fwd: ...we can indeed bring an end to this crisis
Rev: JUST THE OPPOSITE
Fwd: ...Turn a situation of tragedy into one of
Rev: CHERISH THIS. - HE HAS
RELEASED THE BOMB.
The URL for this page is http://www.ken-welch.com/War.html
This page will be updated as events dictate - rather
than any set schedule. Be sure to use the "refresh
button" on your browser to make sure you have a fresh
copy on your screen.
NOTES: I see
that David Oates, the discoverer of reversed speech, is
making a fool of himself again by declaring that
everything on Ken-Welch.Com is a hoax. That's a tough
stand to take since there's really no way to fake speech
reversals. Of course, if they really could be faked,
then only David Oates could be relied on to tell you
what was true and what wasn't. Still, if you would
prefer a cotten-candy world rather than the insights
offered here, there's a place you can hang your hat.
Watching the forums, I can see that the people
discussing this site fall into two very well defined
groups; those that have listened to the reversals and
realize how they all work together, and those that have
managed neither one.
Still, I suppose no one gets angrier than a king who
feels his borders are threatened, along with his bread
and butter. Ironically, Oates has chosen a position in
which he is single handedly opposing the New World
Order, with pompous decrees that absolutely nothing will
happen and they will not pursue their goals. Sounds
like King Canute forbidding the tide to come in. A very
awkward choice, I'd say.
However he has made one major contribution in all this:
managing to scare virtually all media sources away from
any discussion of reversed speech. That's a shame since
RS is virtually our only hope in a world drowning in
DATE AND TIME OF ATTACKS
What we have is a very volatile time and place in which
all the ingredients for disaster are firmly and
deliberately in place. Cocked and loaded as they say.
This could go on for many weeks. The reason this report
has been put up in such a hurry is that I came to
realize that the most dangerous time, i.e. the time of
highest probability, was right up front.
If the trigger isn't pulled right
away, it is only because they are waiting for something
we don't know about. There is way too much at stake to
imagine that this little web site will have any
influence on the outcome.
Initially, I expected to have more time to put this
story together. The Texas City bomb was officially
released about two weeks after it's arrival in
Galveston Bay - then it sat there forever, waiting for
the target date. That's why we managed to gather such a
huge number of reversals about it. Still, I found
myself getting nervous as I sensed that the network
coverage of the Lebanon slaughter seemed to have reached
a plateau - and viewers were beginning to slip away. If
nothing else, this is a made-for-television war. That
means it cannot go on forever without reaching a
climax. So far it has achieved it's purpose, which I
believe is to make everyone more accepting of the idea
of angry Arab retaliation. If we ourselves are angry at
what we are seeing, we can easily imagine how furious
the people must be in Beirut, Tehran, Damascus, and so
I got a kick in the pants from a Blair reversal in the
press conference covered above. I found, "In one week",
in a place that suggested it might be a time for the
event. The reason it is not presented above is that the
last letter, k, was not present. I've mentioned
elsewhere that this is fairly common, because of the
mechanics of the way reversed speech is produced. When
time permits, and perhaps with the benefit of hindsight,
we can trot it out and compare it with other data found
in the meantime.
But the key point is, at this moment we have
no other reversals that pinpoint a date. I'm
normally a stickler for having different pieces of
information that confirm each other. I have no doubt
that we can find more reversals and that at least one
will be shown to reveal the intended date, but RS work
takes time. On Tuesday evening all I had was the
nagging thought that the one week time suggestion might
be of great importance.
It was a European contributor to Ken-Welch.com that had
requested we do reversals on Blair some time ago. We
had missed one good opportunity for lack of time. I
e-mailed him with the news that we had been able to
grant his wish, and that it appeared that the attack on
Iran we've all been waiting for was again "on". I then
scanned news reports and found two puzzling stories from
Israel. According to the Jerusalem Post, Ehud Olmert,
(Prime Minister, if a country without a constitution can
have such thing) had just
declared victory for the Lebanon campaign.
Much of Olmert's Tuesday speech was B.S. for the troops,
and events of the following day would show that.
However, it was in amazing contrast to the Haaretz.com
story mentioned above, which very casually mentioned
that Israel had just
called up three divisions of it's army reserve.
That's thousands and thousands of soldiers. Israel is
famous for its ability to mobilize rapidly. If the
call-up was on Tuesday, most of these men would be at
their staging areas by Thursday. What would they be
I also noted that all official sources in Israel now
refer to the country being at War rather than
securing the border, conducting anti-terrorist
operations, putting down the Indians, etc.
As I puzzled over this, the European contributor came
back with fascinating information. If you like
"predictions" you will definitely like this. It seems
that years ago a man named Andy McCracken published the
date of Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, as the most likely
date for the beginning of World War Three. How did he
do it? Bible Codes. Yes, I know all about the
controversy over Bible codes. But first let's look at
the date itself. I learned that this Thursday, on the
ancient Hebrew calendar, is the ninth day of the month
of Av. As with most pre-Flood traditions, this appears
to be a lunar calendar, and the date moves around in our
Gregorian system. This day is called TISHAH B'AV.
According to one reference it is the "saddest day in the
Jewish calendar, commemorating by fasting and prayer the
destruction of both the First and the Second Temple." In
other words, a tribal Pearl Harbor Day a thousand times
worse than our own.
If the planners of a terrorist event want to generate
great anger, there is no better choice than picking a
special date. This flopped somewhat on 9-11 because
although the numbers were significant, they really
carried no freight, other than to help everyone remember
the date. However, a good date makes it perfectly clear
that a message is being sent. A message begs you to
imagine the thoughts of the bad guy. Most people don't
realize this, but we often feel more anger over what we
suppose another person was thinking, than about what
they actually did. This is tricky, but if you work with
it for a while you'll see what I mean. Regardless,
Thursday August 3rd suddenly looms large as a possible
date for a serious terror attack on Israel, especially
if the fiction of religious war is to be maintained.
Tisha B'Av actually begins
at Sunset on the previous day. I find this somewhat
confusing, and with the difference in time zones it is
almost impossible to work with. My feeling is that the
initial event in Israel will likely come after dark.
First, because that is the time that matches up best
with live television coverage in the U.S. Complimenting
this is the reversal above saying, "THEN THE FLASH IN
THE NIGHT." Third, if the blast occurs in an industrial
area, loss of life may be minimized if most of the
workers have gone home. In opposition, I must note that
there is nothing more dramatic than a mushroom cloud,
and I don't think cameras can see them all that well in
the dark. This may trump the other ideas. We may have
to let events unfold as they will in that regard.
Anyway, Tisha B'Av ends at local sundown Thursday,
though if the incident was off by a few hours, I suspect
the association would still be clear.
If you are counting, I now have four indicators that
suggest the initial incident is not far off; An
imperfect reversal, major mobilization in Israel for no
apparent reason, a specific prediction which we haven't
yet evaluated, and an ideal date. Let's look at the
Because I told my contributor that nuclear war in the
Middle East was imminent, he had responded with the
suggestion that I check out a blog he had found that
approached this topic from another direction. As it
turned out, the article
Leave Damascus Now - Avoid Tel-Aviv includes links
to a number of Bible Code patterns referring to the
present time, and which reference war and destruction.
The majority are centered around the August 3rd date.
These have been generated by different people, using
different methods, all trying to pinpoint a coming
"world" war, or the destruction of this or that.
Now Bible Codes are fun. You'll never spend a more
enjoyable evening than with someone who has the search
software running and also knows the Hebrew language and
alphabet. I never tried it because I know nothing of
the language, though the current software offers
bi-directional translation. There is also the fact that
when Bible Codes were at their peak of popularity it was
discovered that the haphazard approach of most users was
producing "discoveries" that were essentially
worthless. However, in recent years a significant
effort has been made to define proper methods that guard
against random results that are then mistakenly assumed
to be valid.
One of the most important rules, virtually identical to
a rule for reversed speech in its more common form, is
that the hidden message that is revealed should have
some relationship with the biblical passage in which it
is found. As you will see, this can also add additional
information to the hidden message itself.
The blog's author appears to be fascinated with a
biblical prophecy that some day Damascus (Syria) would
be turned into a pile of rubble. As far as I can tell
this is par for the course. It would be hard to find
any place in the Middle East that has not been cursed or
doomed by God at one time or another. As I mentioned
the blogger collected published Bible Codes that might
be related in some way, and discovered that the majority
centered on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006. If you go about
1/4th down the page you will see a listing that includes
twelve of these, all from another site called
exodus2006.com. I did not go to that site, since the
blogger had already gathered up the material related to
the current period.
Clicking through them I was startled to find two that
seemed to match my own work very closely, in a way that
the blogger could not suspect. The
first one found this hidden message: "3 August 2006
- a fire like a terror" combined with "in that day there
shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel". Since
I already have six months of evidence related to a
fake-terror nuke, you know how I'm going to view this.
This example (and software) did not provide a
translation of the passages in which it was found. Of
interest was the blogger's inability to see the nuclear
weapon. He is focused on the Damascus prophecy which he
summarizes as, "A day will come when Israel suffers a
major attack that causes widespread terror and before
the morning of the next day Israelís vengeance will take
place. That attack is almost certain to be an attack on
Tel Aviv that will kill thousands of people, probably
with chemical and/or biological weapons." A nuke is
simply not an option in his world view.
The second code dealing with 3 August 2006 that
really stood out for me was created with more advanced
software and offers a translation of the originating
verse. A search was performed for the phrase "into
world war". The phrase was found, connected with the
year 2006. It is apparently located in Nehemiah, Ch 9
V37. The translation of the source passage is
If there is one common theme found in the material on
this web site it is that our research reveals a world
that has been corrupted from the top down; our leaders
are following an agenda set by someone else, and are
creating a world headed toward universal slavery. The
biblical passage that linked 2006 with world war is
translated on that page as: "And
it yieldeth much increase unto the kings whom Thou hast
set over us because of our sins; also they have power
over our bodies, and over our cattle, at their pleasure,
and we are in great distress."
We are about to see nuclear war so our leaders can line
their own pockets and fill the coffers of the families
and corporations they actually work for. I think the
description above couldn't be more accurate!
Now you see why, with the bomb already "released" for
use, I feel that the most dangerous time is right now.
I have no doubt that further work with RS will provide
better information, but this could take days or weeks.
Considering the danger, it would be crazy for anyone
exposed in the Middle East to delay whatever
preparations they are led to make. This is why I say
that if you feel you need to do something, you should do
it now. Why take the risk of delay?
For the rest of us, I would suggest that we quickly fill
up our automobiles with as much gas or petrol as they
will hold, and keep them topped up as long as you can
afford it. I do not feel that a Biblical source
refering to "world" war is very likely to mean "global"
war, however you can be certain that there will be
significant economic and social consequences virtually
This is a warning, not a prediction. It is based
on information that involves controversial processes and
interpretative steps that have no "official" standing.
That information provides a way of looking at conditions
as they are, but those conditions may change. The
reader is fully responsible for evaluating the material
presented here, and for any steps they may take as a
result of that evaluation.
Ken-Welch.Com Front Page